
Travel loan conversations usually start with the same question: can you borrow money to meet Australia’s Working Holiday proof of funds expectations. You can borrow in real life, but you cannot safely pretend borrowed funds are your own savings. The $5,670 figure is not an official requirement.
It’s a practical rule of thumb many applicants use to combine the usual $5,000 funds expectation with the visa application charge so you can pay the fee and still land with real cash available.
Key Takeaways

Most working holiday travellers apply under the Working Holiday visa subclass 417 or the Work and Holiday visa subclass 462. The application charge changes over time. That is why the Department of Home Affairs pushes applicants to use the Visa Pricing Estimator in ImmiAccount rather than relying on social media screenshots.
The $5,670 benchmark often appears when the subclass 417 visa application charge is around $670 and people add it to $5,000. If your charge is different on the day you lodge, your budget needs to reflect that.
Situational example:
You have $5,100 saved and you lodge the application that day. Your available funds drop immediately after you pay the charge. If you do not account for the charge, you can end up below the level you intended to show.
Home Affairs pages and Australian embassy guidance commonly use wording like “about AUD 5,000” to support yourself on a working holiday. In practice, this is meant to cover initial living costs while you look for work and set up basics like accommodation, transport, and a phone plan.
This is not a promise that $5,000 is enough for every person in every city. It is a baseline expectation you must be able to show with credible evidence.
The fund expectation is usually paired with a second requirement: you must have an onward or return ticket, or show you can afford one.
Say you have $5,000 in your bank account, but you have no ticket and no extra funds for a ticket. That mismatch can trigger follow up questions. A simple way to avoid this is to keep either the ticket receipt or a clear buffer that covers a realistic flight out of Australia.
Visa pricing can change, and the charge can depend on the date the application is received. The safest approach is to check your charge in the Visa Pricing Estimator before you pay.
Your card has a daily limit that is lower than the charge, or your bank blocks the transaction. You lose time, and if pricing changes between attempts, you can end up paying more.
Not every Working Holiday applicant will need every item below, but many people underestimate these costs.
A health examination can be requested depending on your circumstances and travel history.
Police checks can be required to meet character requirements.
Biometrics can be required for applicants from certain countries and in some cases are provided through an authorised service provider such as VFS Global.
Translations may be required for documents that are not in English. If you use translations, make sure they are clear, consistent, and match the names and dates across your records.
Real world example: your bank statement is in a language other than English and shows a balance that is hard to interpret. A translation that misses account ownership details can create unnecessary requests for information.
Many travellers treat $5,670 as the starting point, then realise they still need a buffer.
Below is a practical illustration. Amounts other than the $5,000 benchmark vary by country and circumstance, so use it as a planning template.
Cost Item
What It Covers
Why It Matters
$5,000 funds benchmark
initial living costs
proof of funds and survival money on arrival
Visa application charge
paid at lodgement
reduces your available cash immediately
Ticket out of Australia
return or onward
required as ticket or as extra funds
Other checks and documents
health, police, biometrics, translations
can be required and can delay you if not planned
The cleanest proof is a bank statement in your name that shows the balance and recent transactions.
A strong statement usually has 3 traits.
Here’s a realistic example:
You attach a statement from 6 months ago because it has a high balance. The case officer asks for an updated statement. You now have to explain why the balance dropped.
A credible statement usually shows a normal savings pattern.
A risky statement is one where the balance appears inflated just before lodgement.
If you take a travel loan, your bank account jumps by $6,000 in 24 hours, then you lodge immediately. Even if you technically have the funds, the pattern can look like temporary parking. If you cannot clearly explain the source, you create unnecessary integrity risk.
A single deposit is not automatically a problem. The issue is whether the deposit is consistent with your explanation and whether your documents match.
If the deposit is a gift, you need a paper trail that makes sense.
If the deposit is borrowed, you should expect questions about whether the funds are genuinely available for your trip, and you must avoid presenting the funds as personal savings.
A holiday loan, personal loan for traveling, or visa loan can be legitimate borrowing for travel costs. The risk is using it to create the appearance of savings.
In case you borrow $7,000, show $5,000 in your account, then repay the loan immediately after you get the visa grant. If the timing looks like you never actually had funds to support yourself, you can be exposed if the Department asks follow up questions or if you are questioned at the border.
The Department of Home Affairs is clear that you must provide accurate information. If you provide bogus documents or information that is false or misleading, you can fail Public Interest Criterion 4020.
This can include doctored bank statements, altered balances, or documents that hide debts or liabilities.
In the event that you edit a PDF statement to remove a loan deposit reference line, or you crop a screenshot so the account name is not visible. That is a serious integrity mistake, not a formatting shortcut.
If you are refused under PIC 4020 for bogus documents or false or misleading information, Home Affairs says a 3 year non grant period may apply for visas that have PIC 4020 as a criterion. A longer non grant period can apply in identity related cases.
This is why it is safer to show your actual position, even if it means delaying travel, rather than trying to manufacture a balance.
If you are short of the funds benchmark, you can reduce risk by planning rather than forcing a balance.
If you delay travel by 8 to 12 weeks and save consistently, your statements will show the pattern a case officer expects.
If family supports you, treat it like documentation, not a private arrangement. A simple written statement of support plus evidence of the funds source can make the position clearer.
A good example is when a parent transfers $5,000 into your account and provides a short letter stating it is a gift for travel costs, with a matching bank statement showing the transfer. The story is coherent and the documents match.
If you use a travel loan, be honest about it and keep your documents consistent.
The safest posture is to treat borrowed funds as borrowing, not savings. You should be prepared to show the loan contract, the deposit into your account, and a realistic plan for repayment that does not rely on finding work immediately.
If that feels uncomfortable, that is a sign that borrowing to meet proof of funds is not the right approach.
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/help-support/meeting-our-requirements/providing-accurate-information
https://www.australia.com/en/youth-travel/working-holiday-visa/faq.html